Skip to main content

Scientific Language & Indigenizing the Classroom

Scientific and Mathematical Language

I will be honest, I do not like scientific and mathematical language. My philosophy has always been a focus on communication. If one is able to communicate ideas effectively, the words and terminology they use are less of a concern to me. I think that the purpose of scientific language is to aide in that communication, and if it is not beneficial to the communication of the idea, it is not serving its purpose. 

Indigenizing the Classroom

Reading this article only solidified my feelings towards indigenous teaching. Through the organization I work for, UBC Geering Up, we work with indigenous communities to combine STEM and indigenous ways of thinking and educating. We focus on how to incorporate STEM lessons within their own framework, rather than have them change their way of learning, thinking, and knowing. This is the approach I want to take to indigenize my classroom. I do not think "indigenizing" my classroom involves me telling their lived experiences. I think it involves me learning and reading the way indigenous peoples learn, teach, and live, and incorporate their holistic approach into my lesson plans. I think this was beautifully demonstrated in the article when Robin Wall Kimmerer brought her own home's perspective on animate language into her botany lesson. The result was a fruitful discussion amongst her students, in which, even if they didn't fully agree in the end, the conversations broadened their mindsets and perspectives on the world. 


Comments

  1. Interesting and thoughtful commentary, Sarah! Your work with Geering Up sounds so integrative and important. I think your goals of communication and discussion are good ones -- an excellent way to start Indigenizing your classroom.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Introducing ME!

 Hey Y'all!  This is my very first post on the blog so I thought I would interview myself so that you all could learn a bit more about ME! Two truths and a lie...can you guess which is the lie?  I lived in Hong Kong for 4 years! I absolutely love flying.  I hate seafood.  What is one of your passions you are excited to bring into the classroom?       I love love love clothing... One of my favourite things is expression through what I wear. I can't wait to have the most aesthetic classroom in the school! Catch me as the teacher that matches my scrunchy, to my mask, to the shoes I'm wearing! As you can see.. I love pink.  What do you like to do in your spare time?      When I am not working, or doing school things, I love to spend time with my family! My dad and I do all sorts of physical activity together from biking to running to swimming. Check out below a picture of my fun dad and I after the UBC triathlon! 

Tact of Teaching

Tact of Teaching “...developing certain qualities or traits of character such as open-mindedness or sincerity, whole-hearted or absorbed interests, responsibility, as well as the need for a habit of thinking in a reflective way...” I think this quote resonates strongly with my belief that teacher development and reflective teaching goes hand in hand with personal development. I think if the focus of our professional development programs and teacher education programs focus on mentoring and encouraging the development of good character traits, we have a better chance at creating good teachers.  “...instead of improving my reaching it worsens... Sometimes the result is that I grow more self-conscious and I become aware of the students looking at me and judging me.” This resonates with my current feelings towards the practicum. After all of the knowledge we have acquired about teaching, I am more nervous than ever before to step in front of a classroom. I have to keep reminding myself...

Sustainable Mathematics

To think of numbers as something that makes you feel, is a seemingly wild concept. This is one of the things that made me stop while reading Moshe Renert's article: "humans' inability to feel large numbers". This passage really resonated with me because I never felt of numbers having a feeling attached to them. I think this additionally ties in with what Jo Boaler & the Stephen Wolfram were trying to argue in their talks. In particular, their emphasis on that 75% of mathematics should be in real-world (25% in computation), whereas we often put more of an emphasis on the computation portion of mathematics. In this way, it makes more sense to me why  Renert's statement of feeling numbers felt like a weird concept.  Another thing that made me stop was honestly the title of the article, "Sustainable Mathematics Education". In reading the title, I had no idea what to expect from the article. Of course, I knew that mathematics and statistics play a vital i...